I wanted this blog to be dynamic, earth shattering,
memorable. BUT wantin’ ain’t gettin’. Funny, how history
is not always what we want it to be. I had a great conversation last week with
an aspiring historian about methodology, historiography, and research, in
general. It began, as I recall with separating the truth from the fiction, about
writing about what really happened as opposed to what we have been taught.
The United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Lost
Cause came up. As a boy growing up in Virginia I knew that the War Between the
States was started by the money grubbing Yankees and their tariffs, and
arrogance. I also knew that “damnYankee” was one word - until I went to
college.
I knew that every Good Ole Rebel was fighting for
independence and not for the perpetuation of slavery and that the Southern
Confederacy was truly united – kind of oxymoronic, isn’t it? (A united
Confederation.) Dr. Phil McGraw says that “perception is reality” and I agree,
however being somewhat “teched,” I also know that perceived truth is not always
the truth. Perhaps the blessing of knowing that I am flawed makes it easier to
identify misperceptions because I have had first hand experiences with them.
The truth is that slavery was the underlying cause
of the war, despite the fact that the average U.S. citizen did not care to
admit that. Lincoln knew that when he committed the nation to an undeclared
war. The Southern economy, political structure, and society evolved around the
ownership of human property. The 25% of the landed citizenry, including
freedmen owned slaves. Like it or not, the records show that.
The South was never united. Every Confederate state
except South Carolina provided at least one white regiment or battery to the
Union Army. South Carolina provided the first black regiment, the 1st South
Carolina Volunteers. A quick check of Dyer’s Compendium of the War of the Rebellion proves it.
We discussed how the war is portrayed in popular
culture – bold men courageously standing shoulder-to-shoulder blazing away at
each other under the direction of mounted officers who could control everything
like generals in a board game. Cardboard soldiers on a checkerboard field. It
just was not that way.
High humidity, rolling hills, impenetrable smoke,
ear numbing, head jarring noise and chaos dominated the field. Visibility could
be reduced to a matter of feet. That is when the close engagements occurred;
even then if the ground afforded cover the soldiers took advantage of it with
or without orders. Men did turn and walk
off the field rather than face annihilation. They displayed common sense not
cowardice.
Grandma might have told you that her grandfather led
a charge, when he might not have. The pension records could possibly verify
that. The war was not glorious. From the human perspective, no war is.
Romanticizing it does a disservice to the men, women, and children who perished.
It was gruesome, filthy, and brutal.
During the conflict some Confederate infantry did wear blue uniforms into
battle and did fly the U.S. flag. Both sides used exploding bullets – early
versions of dumdums. Both sides during an engagement would occasionally finish
off wounded men and the soldiers trying to surrender. On some fields the dead
were cremated because the armies had lost too many men to bury. Officers got
“fragged” (murdered) by enlisted men. Artillery did deliberately fire through
their own troops to save their guns. Soldiers lied down and let “green” troops
go to their certain deaths.
A considerable portion of the armies deserted at one
time or another throughout the war. The armies executed murderers and rapists,
as well as deserters. The problem with researching any history is that it makes
a person uncomfortable. I think, perhaps, that as a people, according to the news,
have gotten too thin-skinned. We cannot laugh at ourselves or with ourselves. We’re
too self-centered and narrowly focused. I do not know. We cannot undo what
happened. We need to accept that it did and our wishing it had not occurred
will not change it one bit.
It kind of reminds me of the sending off of a slow
cowpoke at his funeral. “The Good Book says something about the quick and the
dead. Well, Shorty he shore warent quick but he shore are dead.”
The monuments on battlefields are dedicated mostly
to the fallen rather than the living. They are tombstones. There is nothing
wrong with them. They remind us of the horrible cost of war. I accept them for
what they are. They reflect the lives of the dead they way we prefer to
remember them, and not, necessarily the way they were. They often represent the
sentimental, inspiring reminders of a past which has been sanitized and
glorified to help us cope with the Dantean reality of the senseless carnage of
war. Rather than destroy them, deface them or remove them because they
represent the “wrong side” or the individuals who fought for the “wrong side,”
use them as aids to facilitate learning about why they exist and why they are
so controversial. Burying the sins of the past without dealing them is like
sweeping the proverbial “dirt under the rug.” The problem is hidden and not
being dealt with at all.
We discussed how difficult it is to reconcile “family
stories” with what really happened. I had relatives on both sides during the
war. Two great-great uncles fought with the 16th Tennessee Mounted infantry at
Murfreesboro. One was killed, the other captured. That uncle took the oath
after spending time on Johnson’s Island but never reconstructed. I had two
other relatives in the Union. One was discharged with a disability and the
other told my grandmother he hauled cannonballs during the war. He served in
the 5th New York Heavies until 1863. After getting promoted to corporal, he
deserted. Not everyone who serves is a hero. Not all heroes are nice people.
It is easier to glorify the inglorious than to deal with the reality. As humans
we generally reserve our platitudes until the funeral, as reflected in most
monuments and tombstones. We mummify our dead through embalming; earlier in our
history individuals took photographs of the deceased, and we erect tombstones to
remind us of their existence. Very few tombstones reflect the reality of those
individuals. If they did, they would read like the following actual
inscriptions:
Here Lies My
Wife,
A Slattern and a
Shrew
If I Should Say
I Loved Her,
I Would Lie Here
Too
Here Lies John
Smith
And His Wife.
Their Warfare Is
Accomplished
Thank you for taking the time to read
this. Constructive comments are always welcomed.
Well said sir! In the past, I was determined to stand by "Lost Cause" mythology, believing that there was something more to the reason why Southern soldiers fought. But, States Rights, "cuz your down here", wasn't explaining it thorough enough. Adventure seeking youth combined with a total disdain for the North seems more palatable these days, with the underlying economics of slavery.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy your writing, please continue to share your knowledge. My "go to" Antietam book is your "Antietam: A Soldiers Battle". I've read it a couple times over the years. Currently paging through your "Stand to it and give them Hell" Gettysburg 2nd Day book. By the way, were you giving a tour to students near the Wheatfield in Gettysburg this past Tuesday (April 30th)? My family and I drove right by you.
Thank you for your comment. I was there as a volunteer for a high school class.
ReplyDeleteGreat post. Well written. 😀
ReplyDelete